In today’s world, maintaining a fair and competitive market is crucial for business ethics and law. Major tech companies such as Apple, Google, and Microsoft have been convicted of monopolistic practices in various jurisdictions, often resulting in severe monetary penalties. However, the mere existence of multiple major companies competing in the same market acts as a legal safeguard against monopolies. Although Apple and Google dominate the smartphone market, I still consider them separate entities and compete relentlessly for the same customer base.
The Secret Agreement
Despite the legal safeguard, sometimes appearances can be deceiving. According to reports by The Register and 9to5Mac, Google pays a percentage of its revenue generated from Chrome usage on iOS to Apple in exchange for Apple not building a competitor to Google Search. This secret agreement suggests that Google relies heavily on its customers using Chrome and Google Search, which generates over 80% of Google’s revenue from advertisements. It is worth a significant amount of money to Google and parent company Alphabet to keep users in the Google ecosystem for all their browsing needs. One way to achieve this is to pay their main competitor not to compete in that field.
Revenue-sharing agreements are common among large corporations. Apple, for example, generates a significant portion of search revenue from Google, which ensures that Google Search remains the default search option on Apple phones, tablets, and other devices. However, such agreements can be legally complicated, especially for multinational corporations. Different legal jurisdictions have different regulations that serve the important purpose of preventing any one company or group of companies from controlling access to vital goods and services.
Impact on Market Competition
The Register’s anonymous source provides compelling documentation that could significantly impact the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority’s ongoing investigation into Google and Apple, as well as the U.S. Justice Department’s antitrust lawsuit against Google. This information suggests that revenue-sharing agreements can affect market competition and access to vital goods and services. Hence, it is crucial to maintain fair and competitive markets to avoid monopolies, uphold business law and ethics, and protect the interests of customers and businesses alike.
Read more; HUAWEI 90-DAY LICENSE EXTENSION STILL LEAVES MATE 30 FATE IN LIMBO
In conclusion, while revenue-sharing agreements between large corporations such as Google and Apple are common, they can potentially harm market competition, and strict regulations are necessary to prevent monopolies. As customers, it is crucial to stay informed about such agreements and choose the products and services that best align with our interests and values.